Federal Highway Administration
Region 09 NEPA Reviewers
FHWA Survey of Resource Agencies Rating Processes With Transportation
Agencies
July 29, 2003
This document
contains proprietary research, copyrighted materials and literary property of
The Gallup Organization. It is for the guidance of your company's executives
only and is not to be copied, quoted, published or divulged to others outside of
your organization. We ask that this document be safeguarded, allowing no
physical or electronic duplication, allowing no one outside your organization to
view this document, and allowing no one to duplicate or change that contents in
an effort to formulate an inferior product. No changes may be made to this
document without the express written permission of The Gallup Organization.
Introduction
The following pages provide a summary of
responses to the Gallup/FHWA Survey of Resource Agencies. Respondents were asked
to rate a recent project with a transportation agency, so the data reflect the
views of the resource agencies toward those projects with transportation
agencies. The survey statements were generally rated on a scale which required a
response from among six response categories:
5
|
Strongly Agree |
Extremely Satisfied |
Excellent |
4
|
 |
 |
 |
3
|
 |
 |
 |
2
|
 |
 |
 |
1
|
Strongly Disagree |
Extremely Dissatisfied |
Poor |

|
Does Not Apply or Don't Know |
The statement or dimension averages are based on a 5-point scale, with " 1 "
being the lowest possible average and " 5 " being the highest average. "Does Not Apply" or "Don't Know" responses are not scored. The FHWA Resource Agency
Scorecard provides feedback on how the region is doing with regards to NEPA
processes as compared to the "best practice" or highest scoring region for each
survey item. Note the following term definitions :
| Term |
Definition |
| Index |
The average top box response percentages
for statements measuring each category of survey items (Relationship,
Communication, Timeliness, Performance, General). |
| Top Box |
The percentage of "5"
(Strongly Agree /
Extremely Satisfied / Excellent) responses. |
| Best Practice Region
|
The region with the highest percentage of
top box responses. |
| Region 1 |
Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New
Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont |
| Region 2 |
New Jersey, New York |
| Region 3 |
Delaware, Washington D.C., Maryland,
Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia |
| Region 4 |
Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky,
Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee |
| Region 5 |
Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota,
Ohio, Wisconsin |
| Region 6 |
Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico,
Oklahoma, Texas |
| Region 7 |
Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska |
| Region 8 |
Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South
Dakota, Utah, Wyoming |
| Region 9 |
Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada
|
| Region 10 |
Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington
|
Resource Agency Scorecard %1 - %5 and means not shown when n <
5 * Denotes more than one best practice region with multiple sample
sizes
Unit : Region 09 Total N : 37
| Index |
Region 09 Top Box(%5) |
Best Practice Region Top Box(%5) |
| RELATIONSHIP |
41 |
58 |
| COMMUNICATION |
32 |
51 |
| TIMELINESS |
23 |
42 |
| PERFORMANCE |
26 |
51 |
| GENERAL |
23 |
42 |
Gallup FHWA Resource Survey Items
| Question Text |
Region 09 Top Box(%5) |
Best Practice Region Top Box(%5) |
| Overall satisfaction with the
transportation agency's performance on this project (1) |
35 |
38 |
RELATIONSHIP
| Question Text |
Region 09 Top Box(%5) |
Best Practice Region Top Box(%5) |
| My agency knew what was expected
(6a) |
61 |
76 |
| The transportation agency
provided my agency with materials we needed (6b) |
32 |
57 |
| The transportation agency
appreciated our contribution to the process (6c) |
36 |
47 |
| The transportation agency
wanted to play an active role (6d) |
43 |
60 |
| My agency's opinions seemed to
count (6e) |
44 |
71 |
| The transportation agency helped
to move this project forward (6g) |
49 |
58 |
| The transportation agency made
efforts to improve the process (6h) |
22 |
45 |
COMMUNICATION
| Question Text |
Region 09 Top Box(%5) |
Best Practice Region Top Box(%5) |
| Involved us early on in the
process (7a) |
24 |
65 |
| Responded in a timely way (7b)
|
34 |
63 |
| Invited our participation in key
meetings (7c) |
31 |
60 |
| Kept us informed of their
progress (7d) |
28 |
44 |
| Were open and honest with us
(7e) |
37 |
60 |
| Were open to our suggestions or
alternatives (7f) |
32 |
47 |
| Gave reasonable suggestions or
alternatives (7g) |
26 |
38 |
| Gave clear explanations if they
did not agree with our recommendations (7h) |
33 |
33 |
| Willing to compromise (7i)
|
26 |
50 |
| Adequate participation at key
meetings (7j) |
43 |
71 |
| Sufficient level of communication
(7k) |
32 |
62 |
TIMELINESS
| Question Text |
Region 09 Top Box(%5)
|
Best Practice Region Top Box(%5)
|
| Adhered to schedules (8a)
|
14 |
53 |
| Gave my agency enough time to
accomplish tasks (8b) |
35 |
55 |
| Entire process took reasonable
amount of time (8c) |
24 |
52 |
| Process could have been
shortened (8d) (% 1=Strongly Disagree) |
18 |
37 |
PERFORMANCE
| Question Text |
Region 09 Top Box(%5)
|
Best Practice Region Top Box(%5)
|
| Quality of information
(9a) |
22 |
33 |
| Completeness of information (9b)
|
24 |
38 |
| Competence of agency staff (9c)
|
35 |
75 |
| Ability to stay organized (9d)
|
21 |
67 |
| Understanding my agency's
requirements (9e) |
22 |
57 |
| Level of resources devoted
(9f) |
33 |
67 |
| Range of reasonable alternatives
suggested (9g) |
23 |
42 |
| Willingness to consider
mitigation measures (9h) |
32 |
47 |
| How good a job they did at
protecting the environment (9i) |
21 |
40 |
GENERAL
| Question Text |
Region 09 Top Box(%5)
|
Best Practice Region Top Box(%5)
|
| Understands my agency's mission
(11a) |
14 |
43 |
| Cares about my agency's mission
(11b) |
14 |
31 |
| Committed to doing quality work
(11c) |
24 |
52 |
| Has competent staff (11d)
|
31 |
70 |
| Sufficient level of trust between
the two agencies (11e) |
19 |
52 |
| Committed to making environmental
review process efficient (11f) |
11 |
34 |
| Willing to compromise
(11g) |
17 |
25 |
| Sufficient level of communication
between the two agencies (11h) |
28 |
43 |
| Committed to improving the
environment (11i) |
21 |
33 |
| Change in relationship over past 3
years (% 3=Improved) (12) |
56 |
71 |
| Overall characterization of
relationship (% 5=Excellent) (13) |
19 |
43 |
PROBLEMS (YES/NO)
| Question Text |
Region 09 Top Box(%5)
|
Best Practice Region Top Box(%5)
|
| Experienced a problem
(2) |
46 |
22 |
| Problem at early project
planning/scoping (3a) |
44 |
14 |
| Problem at defining purpose and
need (3b) |
38 |
13 |
| Problem at information/data collection (3c) |
71 |
29 |
| Problem at development/analysis
of alternatives (3d) |
65 |
38 |
| Problem at analysis of impacts (3e) |
71 |
29 |
| Problem at selection of alternative (3f) |
43 |
33 |
| Problem at commitment to mitigation (3g) |
33 |
33 |
| Problem at finalizing
documents/response to comments (3h) |
69 |
0 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Extremely Dissatisfied...Extremely Satisfied |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 01 |
Overall, how satisfied were
you with the agency's performance on this project? |
Region 09 |
37 |
3 |
22 |
14 |
27 |
35 |
3.7 |
 |
35 |
| Best Practice Region |
21 |
0 |
5 |
19 |
38 |
38 |
4.1 |
7 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 06A |
My agency knew what was expected of it in this process. |
Region 09 |
36 |
0 |
6 |
3 |
31 |
61 |
4.47 |
 |
61 |
| Best Practice Region |
21 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
19 |
76 |
4.71 |
7 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 06B |
The transportation agency provided my agency with the materials, information, or documentation that we needed. |
Region 09 |
37 |
3 |
19 |
27 |
19 |
32 |
3.59 |
 |
32 |
| Best Practice Region |
21 |
0 |
14 |
0 |
29 |
57 |
4.29 |
7 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 06C |
The transportation agency appreciated our contribution to the process. |
Region 09 |
36 |
3 |
8 |
22 |
31 |
36 |
3.89 |
 |
36 |
| Best Practice Region |
19 |
11 |
5 |
11 |
26 |
47 |
3.95 |
7 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 06D |
The transportation agency wanted to play an active role |
Region 09 |
37 |
3 |
5 |
14 |
35 |
43 |
4.11 |
 |
43 |
| Best Practice Region |
20 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
35 |
60 |
4.55 |
1 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 06E |
My agency's opinions counted in the permitting process. |
Region 09 |
36 |
6 |
8 |
17 |
25 |
44 |
3.94 |
 |
44 |
| Best Practice Region |
21 |
5 |
10 |
0 |
14 |
71 |
4.38 |
7 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 06G |
The transportation agency helped to move this project forward. |
Region 09 |
37 |
3 |
5 |
16 |
27 |
49 |
4.14 |
 |
49 |
| Best Practice Region |
33 |
3 |
0 |
27 |
12 |
58 |
4.21 |
4 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 06H |
The transportation agency made efforts to improve the process. |
Region 09 |
37 |
5 |
19 |
30 |
24 |
22 |
3.38 |
 |
22 |
| Best Practice Region |
20 |
0 |
10 |
25 |
20 |
45 |
4 |
1 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 07A |
Involved us early on in the process. |
Region 09 |
33 |
6 |
12 |
18 |
39 |
24 |
3.64 |
 |
24 |
| Best Practice Region |
31 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
16 |
65 |
4.26 |
3 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 07B |
Responded in a timely way to our requests. |
Region 09 |
35 |
0 |
9 |
37 |
20 |
34 |
3.8 |
 |
34 |
| Best Practice Region |
19 |
0 |
0 |
26 |
11 |
63 |
4.37 |
7 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 07C |
Invited our participation in key meetings. |
Region 09 |
32 |
3 |
9 |
16 |
41 |
31 |
3.88 |
 |
31 |
| Best Practice Region |
20 |
5 |
0 |
20 |
15 |
60 |
4.25 |
1 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 07D |
Kept us informed of their progress. |
Region 09 |
36 |
3 |
11 |
33 |
25 |
28 |
3.64 |
 |
28 |
| Best Practice Region |
18 |
0 |
22 |
17 |
17 |
44 |
3.83 |
7 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 07E |
Were open and honest with us. |
Region 09 |
35 |
3 |
6 |
14 |
40 |
37 |
4.03 |
 |
37 |
| Best Practice Region |
20 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
25 |
60 |
4.35 |
1 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 07F |
Were open to our suggestions or alternatives. |
Region 09 |
34 |
3 |
9 |
29 |
26 |
32 |
3.76 |
 |
32 |
| Best Practice Region |
19 |
5 |
11 |
16 |
21 |
47 |
3.95 |
7 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 07G |
Gave reasonable suggestions or alternatives. |
Region 09 |
31 |
3 |
10 |
35 |
26 |
26 |
3.61 |
 |
26 |
| Best Practice Region |
29 |
3 |
7 |
10 |
41 |
38 |
4.03 |
3 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 07H |
Gave clear explanations if they did not agree with our recommendations. |
Region 09 |
27 |
4 |
19 |
26 |
19 |
33 |
3.59 |
 |
33 |
| Best Practice Region |
27 |
4 |
19 |
26 |
19 |
33 |
3.59 |
9 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 07I |
Willing to compromise. |
Region 09 |
31 |
3 |
16 |
35 |
19 |
26 |
3.48 |
 |
26 |
| Best Practice Region |
16 |
0 |
19 |
19 |
13 |
50 |
3.94 |
7 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 07J |
Had adequate participation at key meetings. |
Region 09 |
28 |
0 |
14 |
11 |
32 |
43 |
4.04 |
 |
43 |
| Best Practice Region |
17 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
29 |
71 |
4.71 |
7 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 07K |
Overall, there was a sufficient level of communication between the two agencies on this project. |
Region 09 |
37 |
0 |
11 |
30 |
27 |
32 |
3.81 |
 |
32 |
| Best Practice Region |
21 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
29 |
62 |
4.52 |
7 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 08A |
Adhered to schedules set throughout the process. |
Region 09 |
28 |
7 |
14 |
32 |
32 |
14 |
3.32 |
 |
14 |
| Best Practice Region |
19 |
0 |
5 |
16 |
26 |
53 |
4.26 |
7 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 08B |
Gave your agency enough time to accomplish tasks. |
Region 09 |
37 |
5 |
11 |
22 |
27 |
35 |
3.76 |
 |
35 |
| Best Practice Region |
31 |
0 |
3 |
19 |
23 |
55 |
4.29 |
3 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 08C |
Entire process took a reasonable amount of time. |
Region 09 |
33 |
9 |
18 |
27 |
21 |
24 |
3.33 |
 |
24 |
| Best Practice Region |
21 |
0 |
5 |
19 |
24 |
52 |
4.24 |
7 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 08D |
The Process could have been shortened without compromising NEPA. |
Region 09 |
33 |
18 |
30 |
6 |
33 |
12 |
2.91 |
 |
18 |
| Best Practice Region |
27 |
37 |
11 |
15 |
19 |
19 |
2.7 |
4 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 09A |
Quality of information the transportation agency provided to your agency. |
Region 09 |
37 |
3 |
16 |
22 |
38 |
22 |
3.59 |
 |
22 |
| Best Practice Region |
21 |
0 |
14 |
5 |
48 |
33 |
4 |
7 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Poor...Excellent |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 09B |
Completeness of information they provided. |
Region 09 |
37 |
5 |
22 |
30 |
19 |
24 |
3.35 |
 |
24 |
| Best Practice Region |
21 |
0 |
14 |
14 |
33 |
38 |
3.95 |
7 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Poor...Excellent |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 09C |
Competence of their agency staff you interacted with. |
Region 09 |
37 |
0 |
5 |
19 |
41 |
35 |
4.05 |
 |
35 |
| Best Practice Region |
20 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
15 |
75 |
4.6 |
7 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Poor...Excellent |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 09D |
Ability to stay organized throughout the project. |
Region 09 |
34 |
0 |
12 |
26 |
41 |
21 |
3.71 |
 |
21 |
| Best Practice Region |
21 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
24 |
67 |
4.57 |
7 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Poor...Excellent |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 09E |
Their understanding of your agency's requirements. |
Region 09 |
37 |
5 |
19 |
22 |
32 |
22 |
3.46 |
 |
22 |
| Best Practice Region |
21 |
10 |
5 |
10 |
19 |
57 |
4.1 |
7 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Poor...Excellent |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 09F |
The level of resources they devoted to this project. |
Region 09 |
33 |
0 |
9 |
18 |
39 |
33 |
3.97 |
 |
33 |
| Best Practice Region |
18 |
0 |
6 |
11 |
17 |
67 |
4.44 |
7 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Poor...Excellent |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 09G |
Range of reasonable alternatives they suggested for this project. |
Region 09 |
30 |
3 |
7 |
30 |
37 |
23 |
3.7 |
 |
23 |
| Best Practice Region |
26 |
4 |
0 |
12 |
42 |
42 |
4.19 |
3 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Poor...Excellent |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 09H |
Willingness to consider a range of mitigation measures. |
Region 09 |
28 |
0 |
7 |
25 |
36 |
32 |
3.93 |
 |
32 |
| Best Practice Region |
19 |
0 |
16 |
5 |
32 |
47 |
4.11 |
7 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Poor...Excellent |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 09I |
How good a job they did at protecting the environment. |
Region 09 |
33 |
6 |
9 |
24 |
39 |
21 |
3.61 |
 |
21 |
| Best Practice Region |
20 |
0 |
15 |
15 |
30 |
40 |
3.95 |
7 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 11A |
Understands your agency's mission. |
Region 09 |
36 |
3 |
6 |
47 |
31 |
14 |
3.47 |
 |
14 |
| Best Practice Region |
21 |
0 |
10 |
24 |
24 |
43 |
4 |
7 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 11B |
Cares about your agency's mission. |
Region 09 |
35 |
0 |
17 |
34 |
34 |
14 |
3.46 |
 |
14 |
| Best Practice Region |
32 |
6 |
19 |
25 |
19 |
31 |
3.5 |
4 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 11C |
Committed to doing quality work. |
Region 09 |
34 |
6 |
6 |
26 |
38 |
24 |
3.68 |
 |
24 |
| Best Practice Region |
21 |
0 |
10 |
14 |
24 |
52 |
4.19 |
7 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 11D |
Has competent staff. |
Region 09 |
36 |
0 |
0 |
36 |
33 |
31 |
3.94 |
 |
31 |
| Best Practice Region |
20 |
0 |
5 |
10 |
15 |
70 |
4.5 |
7 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 11E |
There is a sufficient level of trust between your two agencies. |
Region 09 |
36 |
0 |
11 |
42 |
28 |
19 |
3.56 |
 |
19 |
| Best Practice Region |
21 |
0 |
14 |
29 |
5 |
52 |
3.95 |
7 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 11F |
Is committed to making the environmental review process efficient. |
Region 09 |
36 |
8 |
17 |
42 |
22 |
11 |
3.11 |
 |
11 |
| Best Practice Region |
32 |
0 |
13 |
19 |
34 |
34 |
3.91 |
3 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 11G |
Is willing to compromise. |
Region 09 |
35 |
0 |
17 |
37 |
29 |
17 |
3.46 |
 |
17 |
| Best Practice Region |
20 |
0 |
5 |
25 |
45 |
25 |
3.9 |
1 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 11H |
There is a sufficient level of communication between the two agencies. |
Region 09 |
36 |
0 |
11 |
33 |
28 |
28 |
3.72 |
 |
28 |
| Best Practice Region |
21 |
0 |
5 |
24 |
29 |
43 |
4.1 |
7 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 11I |
Is committed to improving theenvironment. |
Region 09 |
33 |
6 |
24 |
33 |
15 |
21 |
3.21 |
 |
21 |
| Best Practice Region |
21 |
5 |
19 |
14 |
29 |
33 |
3.67 |
7 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Worse...Improved |
Best Practice Region |
% Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
| 12
|
Over the past 3 years, has
your agency's overall relationship with the transportation agency
improved, stayed the same, or gotten worse? |
Region 09 |
36 |
8 |
36 |
56 |
 |
56 |
| Best Practice Region |
34 |
0 |
29 |
71 |
4 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Poor...Excellent |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 13 |
How would you characterize the relationship between your agency and the transportation agency? |
Region 09 |
36 |
0 |
8 |
33 |
39 |
19 |
3.69 |
 |
19 |
| Best Practice Region |
21 |
0 |
10 |
14 |
33 |
43 |
4.1 |
7 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
YES NO |
Best Practice Region |
% of Yes Response Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
| 02
|
Did you experience any
problems with the transportation agency during this project? |
Region 09 |
37 |
46 |
54 |
 |
46 |
| Best Practice Region |
32 |
22 |
78 |
3 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
YES NO |
Best Practice Region |
% of Yes Response Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
| 03A |
Problems at early project planning or scoping. |
Region 09 |
16 |
44 |
56 |
 |
44 |
| Best Practice Region |
7 |
14 |
86 |
3 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
YES NO |
Best Practice Region |
% of Yes Response Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
| 03B |
Problems at defining purpose and need. |
Region 09 |
16 |
38 |
63 |
 |
38 |
| Best Practice Region |
8 |
13 |
88 |
1 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
YES NO |
Best Practice Region |
% of Yes Response Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
| 03C
|
Problems at information or data collection. |
Region 09 |
17 |
71 |
29 |
 |
71 |
| Best Practice Region |
7 |
29 |
71 |
3 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
YES NO |
Best Practice Region |
% of Yes Response Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
| 03D
|
Problems at development and analysis of alternatives. |
Region 09 |
17 |
65 |
35 |
 |
65 |
| Best Practice Region |
8 |
38 |
63 |
1 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
YES NO |
Best Practice Region |
% of Yes Response Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
| 03E
|
Problems at analysis of impacts. |
Region 09 |
17 |
71 |
29 |
 |
71 |
| Best Practice Region |
7 |
29 |
71 |
3 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
YES NO |
Best Practice Region |
% of Yes Response Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
| 03F
|
Problems at selection of preferred alternatives. |
Region 09 |
14 |
43 |
57 |
 |
43 |
| Best Practice Region |
* |
33 |
67 |
4,5 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
YES NO |
Best Practice Region |
% of Yes Response Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
| 03G
|
Problems at commitment to mitigation measures. |
Region 09 |
15 |
33 |
67 |
 |
33 |
| Best Practice Region |
* |
33 |
67 |
2,3,5,7,9 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
YES NO |
Best Practice Region |
% of Yes Response Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
| 03H
|
Problems at finalizing documents or response to comments. |
Region 09 |
16 |
69 |
31 |
 |
69 |
| Best Practice Region |
6 |
0 |
100 |
7 |
 |
|