Federal Highway Administration
Region 02 NEPA Reviewers
FHWA Survey of Transportation Agencies Rating Processes With Resource Agencies
July 29, 2003
This document contains proprietary research, copyrighted materials and literary property of The Gallup Organization. It is for the guidance of your company's executives only and is not to be copied, quoted, published or divulged to others outside of your organization. We ask that this document be safeguarded, allowing no physical or electronic duplication, allowing no one outside your organization to view this document, and allowing no one to duplicate or change that contents in an effort to formulate an inferior product. No changes may be made to this document without the express written permission of The Gallup Organization.
Introduction
The following pages provide a summary of responses to the Gallup/FHWA Survey of Transportation Agencies. Respondents were asked to rate a recent project with a resource agency, so the data reflect the views of the transportation agencies toward those projects with resource agencies. The survey statements were generally rated on a scale which required a response from among six response categories:
5
|
Strongly Agree
|
Extremely Satisfied
|
Excellent
|
4
|
 |
 |
 |
3
|
 |
 |
 |
2
|
 |
 |
 |
1
|
Strongly Disagree
|
Extremely Dissatisfied
|
Poor
|

|
Does Not Apply or Don't Know
|
The statement or dimension averages are based on a 5-point scale, with " 1 "
being the lowest possible average and " 5 " being the highest average. "Does Not Apply" or "Don't Know" responses are not scored. The FHWA Resource Agency
Scorecard provides feedback on how the region is doing with regards to NEPA
processes as compared to the "best practice" or highest scoring region for each
survey item. Note the following term definitions :
| Term |
Definition |
| Index |
The average top box response percentages
for statements measuring each category of survey items (Relationship,
Communication, Timeliness, Performance, General). |
| Top Box |
The percentage of "5" (Strongly Agree /
Extremely Satisfied / Excellent) responses. |
| Best Practice Region
|
The region with the highest percentage of
top box responses. |
| Region 1 |
Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New
Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont |
| Region 2 |
New Jersey, New York |
| Region 3 |
Delaware, Washington D.C., Maryland,
Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia |
| Region 4 |
Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky,
Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee |
| Region 5 |
Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota,
Ohio, Wisconsin |
| Region 6 |
Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico,
Oklahoma, Texas |
| Region 7 |
Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska |
| Region 8 |
Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South
Dakota, Utah, Wyoming |
| Region 9 |
Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada |
| Region 10 |
Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington |
Transportation Agency Scorecard
%1 - %5 and means not shown when n < 5 * Denotes more than one best practice region with multiple sample sizes
Unit : Region 02 Total N : 24
| Index
|
Region 02 Top Box(%5)
|
Best Practice Region Top Box(%5)
|
| RELATIONSHIP
|
35
|
40
|
| COMMUNICATION
|
27
|
40
|
| TIMELINESS
|
28
|
33
|
| PERFORMANCE
|
26
|
37
|
| GENERAL
|
25
|
33
|
Gallup FHWA Transportation Survey Items
| Question Text
|
Region 02 Top Box(%5)
|
Best Practice Region Top Box(%5)
|
| Overall satisfaction with the resource agency's performance on this project (1)
|
17
|
40
|
RELATIONSHIP
| Question Text
|
Region 02 Top Box(%5)
|
Best Practice Region Top Box(%5)
|
| My agency knew what was expected (6a)
|
63
|
66
|
| The resource agency provided my agency with materials we needed (6b)
|
35
|
42
|
| The resource agency appreciated our contribution to the process (6d)
|
33
|
55
|
| The resource agency wanted to play an active role (6e)
|
42
|
45
|
| My agency's opinions seemed to count (6f)
|
36
|
42
|
| The resource agency helped to move this project forward (6g)
|
30
|
37
|
| The resource agency made efforts to improve the process (6h)
|
8
|
28
|
COMMUNICATION
| Question Text
|
Region 02 Top Box(%5)
|
Best Practice Region Top Box(%5)
|
| Responded in a timely way (7b)
|
18
|
45
|
| Invited our participation in key meetings (7c)
|
16
|
52
|
| Kept us informed of their progress (7d)
|
17
|
25
|
| Were open and honest with us (7e)
|
39
|
69
|
| Were open to our suggestions or alternatives (7f)
|
39
|
40
|
| Gave reasonable suggestions or alternatives (7g)
|
22
|
33
|
| Gave clear explanations if they did not agree with our recommendations (7h)
|
29
|
34
|
| Willing to compromise (7i)
|
25
|
30
|
| Adequate participation at key meetings (7j)
|
26
|
46
|
| Sufficient level of communication (7k)
|
39
|
46
|
TIMELINESS
| Question Text
|
Region 02 Top Box(%5)
|
Best Practice Region Top Box(%5)
|
| Adhered to schedules (8a)
|
24
|
38
|
| Gave my agency enough time to accomplish tasks (8b)
|
36
|
50
|
| Entire process took reasonable amount of time (8c)
|
30
|
39
|
| Process could have been shortened (8d) (% 1=Strongly Disagree)
|
23
|
23
|
PERFORMANCE
| Question Text
|
Region 02 Top Box(%5)
|
Best Practice Region Top Box(%5)
|
| Quality of information (9a)
|
18
|
33
|
| Completeness of information (9b)
|
26
|
38
|
| Competence of agency staff (9c)
|
39
|
51
|
| Ability to stay organized (9d)
|
30
|
35
|
| Understanding my agency's requirements (9e)
|
33
|
35
|
| Level of resources devoted (9f)
|
14
|
29
|
| Range of reasonable alternatives suggested (9g)
|
14
|
32
|
| Willingness to consider mitigation measures (9h)
|
32
|
44
|
GENERAL
| Question Text
|
Region 02 Top Box(%5)
|
Best Practice Region Top Box(%5)
|
| Understands my agency's mission (11a)
|
26
|
39
|
| Cares about my agency's mission (11b)
|
17
|
24
|
| Committed to doing quality work (11c)
|
41
|
56
|
| Has competent staff (11d)
|
42
|
44
|
| Sufficient level of trust between the two agencies (11e)
|
26
|
29
|
| Committed to making environmental review process efficient (11f)
|
17
|
27
|
| Willing to compromise (11g)
|
13
|
15
|
| Sufficient level of communication between the two agencies (11h)
|
17
|
37
|
| Committed to transportation improvements (11j)
|
21
|
29
|
| Change in relationship over past 3 years (% 3=Improved) (12)
|
38
|
65
|
| Overall characterization of relationship (% 5=Excellent) (13)
|
17
|
24
|
PROBLEMS (YES/NO)
| Question Text
|
Region 02 Top Box(%5)
|
Best Practice Region Top Box(%5)
|
| Experienced a problem (2)
|
50
|
22
|
| Problem at early project planning/scoping (3a)
|
25
|
20
|
| Problem at defining purpose and need (3b)
|
33
|
6
|
| Problem at information/data collection (3c)
|
18
|
18
|
| Problem at development/analysis of alternatives (3d)
|
33
|
25
|
| Problem at analysis of impacts (3e)
|
70
|
40
|
| Problem at selection of alternative (3f)
|
55
|
17
|
| Problem at commitment to mitigation (3g)
|
36
|
23
|
| Problem at finalizing documents/response to comments (3h)
|
64
|
40
|
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Extremely Dissatisfied...Extremely
Satisfied |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 01 |
Overall, how satisfied were
you with the agency's performance on this
project? |
Region 02 |
24 |
13 |
4 |
25 |
42 |
17 |
3.46 |
 |
17 |
| Best Practice Region |
52 |
0 |
6 |
17 |
37 |
40 |
4.12 |
6 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 06A |
My agency knew what was
expected of it in this process. |
Region 02 |
24 |
4 |
4 |
13 |
17 |
63 |
4.29 |
 |
63 |
| Best Practice Region |
41 |
0 |
7 |
10 |
17 |
66 |
4.41 |
4 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 06B |
The resource agency
provided my agency with the materials, information, or documentation that
we needed. |
Region 02 |
23 |
9 |
13 |
30 |
13 |
35 |
3.52 |
 |
35 |
| Best Practice Region |
48 |
0 |
8 |
19 |
31 |
42 |
4.06 |
6 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 06D |
The resource agency
wanted to play an active role |
Region 02 |
24 |
17 |
13 |
13 |
25 |
33 |
3.46 |
 |
33 |
| Best Practice Region |
40 |
0 |
13 |
13 |
20 |
55 |
4.18 |
4 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 06E |
My agency's opinions counted
in the permitting process. |
Region 02 |
24 |
17 |
4 |
21 |
17 |
42 |
3.63 |
 |
42 |
| Best Practice Region |
33 |
0 |
6 |
15 |
33 |
45 |
4.18 |
5 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 06F |
The resource agency felt the mission of this project was important. |
Region 02 |
22 |
14 |
0 |
9 |
41 |
36 |
3.86 |
 |
36 |
| Best Practice Region |
26 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
35 |
42 |
3.96 |
7 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 06G |
The resource agency
helped to move this project forward. |
Region 02 |
23 |
22 |
4 |
30 |
13 |
30 |
3.26 |
 |
30 |
| Best Practice Region |
51 |
4 |
6 |
22 |
31 |
37 |
3.92 |
6 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 06H |
The resource agency
made efforts to improve the process. |
Region 02 |
24 |
25 |
21 |
33 |
13 |
8 |
2.58 |
 |
8 |
| Best Practice Region |
47 |
2 |
13 |
30 |
28 |
28 |
3.66 |
6 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 07B |
Responded in a timely way to
our requests. |
Region 02 |
22 |
18 |
14 |
23 |
27 |
18 |
3.14 |
 |
18 |
| Best Practice Region |
51 |
4 |
8 |
25 |
18 |
45 |
3.92 |
6 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 07C |
Invited our participation in
key meetings. |
Region 02 |
19 |
21 |
16 |
32 |
16 |
16 |
2.89 |
 |
16 |
| Best Practice Region |
31 |
6 |
6 |
13 |
23 |
52 |
4.06 |
6 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 07D |
Kept us informed of their
progress. |
Region 02 |
23 |
22 |
35 |
9 |
17 |
17 |
2.74 |
 |
17 |
| Best Practice Region |
44 |
7 |
9 |
32 |
27 |
25 |
3.55 |
6 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 07E |
Were open and honest with us. |
Region 02 |
23 |
22 |
4 |
9 |
26 |
39 |
3.57 |
 |
39 |
| Best Practice Region |
35 |
6 |
3 |
9 |
14 |
69 |
4.37 |
5 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 07F |
Were open to our suggestions
or alternatives. |
Region 02 |
23 |
9 |
13 |
22 |
17 |
39 |
3.65 |
 |
39 |
| Best Practice Region |
45 |
0 |
7 |
18 |
36 |
40 |
4.09 |
6 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 07G |
Gave reasonable suggestions
or alternatives. |
Region 02 |
23 |
17 |
22 |
17 |
22 |
22 |
3.09 |
 |
22 |
| Best Practice Region |
45 |
2 |
16 |
16 |
33 |
33 |
3.8 |
6 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 07H |
Gave clear explanations if
they did not agree with our recommendations. |
Region 02 |
17 |
6 |
6 |
18 |
41 |
29 |
3.82 |
 |
29 |
| Best Practice Region |
29 |
7 |
10 |
24 |
24 |
34 |
3.69 |
5 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 07I |
Willing to compromise. |
Region 02 |
20 |
15 |
15 |
30 |
15 |
25 |
3.2 |
 |
25 |
| Best Practice Region |
40 |
3 |
10 |
33 |
25 |
30 |
3.7 |
6 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 07J |
Had adequate participation at
key meetings. |
Region 02 |
19 |
26 |
21 |
16 |
11 |
26 |
2.89 |
 |
26 |
| Best Practice Region |
28 |
4 |
14 |
14 |
21 |
46 |
3.93 |
5 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 07K |
Overall, there was a
sufficient level of communication between the two agencies on this
project. |
Region 02 |
23 |
13 |
9 |
13 |
26 |
39 |
3.7 |
 |
39 |
| Best Practice Region |
52 |
0 |
4 |
29 |
21 |
46 |
4.1 |
6 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 08A |
Adhered to schedules set
throughout the process. |
Region 02 |
21 |
19 |
10 |
14 |
33 |
24 |
3.33 |
 |
24 |
| Best Practice Region |
39 |
5 |
3 |
26 |
28 |
38 |
3.92 |
8 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 08B |
Gave your agency enough time
to accomplish tasks. |
Region 02 |
22 |
9 |
5 |
18 |
32 |
36 |
3.82 |
 |
36 |
| Best Practice Region |
30 |
0 |
3 |
13 |
33 |
50 |
4.3 |
8 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 08C |
Entire process took a
reasonable amount of time. |
Region 02 |
23 |
13 |
17 |
17 |
22 |
30 |
3.39 |
 |
30 |
| Best Practice Region |
23 |
0 |
9 |
30 |
22 |
39 |
3.91 |
1 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 08D |
The Process could have been
shortened without compromising NEPA. |
Region 02 |
22 |
23 |
5 |
9 |
23 |
41 |
3.55 |
 |
23 |
| Best Practice Region |
22 |
23 |
5 |
9 |
23 |
41 |
3.55 |
2 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 09A |
Quality of information the
resource agency provided to your agency. |
Region 02 |
22 |
14 |
5 |
36 |
27 |
18 |
3.32 |
 |
18 |
| Best Practice Region |
48 |
2 |
4 |
21 |
40 |
33 |
3.98 |
6 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Poor...Excellent |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 09B |
Completeness of information
they provided. |
Region 02 |
23 |
13 |
0 |
26 |
35 |
26 |
3.61 |
 |
26 |
| Best Practice Region |
48 |
2 |
8 |
29 |
23 |
38 |
3.85 |
6 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Poor...Excellent |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 09C |
Competence of their agency
staff you interacted with. |
Region 02 |
23 |
4 |
9 |
17 |
30 |
39 |
3.91 |
 |
39 |
| Best Practice Region |
51 |
0 |
4 |
16 |
29 |
51 |
4.27 |
6 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Poor...Excellent |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 09D |
Ability to stay organized
throughout the project. |
Region 02 |
23 |
4 |
9 |
30 |
26 |
30 |
3.7 |
 |
30 |
| Best Practice Region |
51 |
0 |
10 |
18 |
37 |
35 |
3.98 |
6 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Poor...Excellent |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 09E |
Their understanding of your
agency's requirements. |
Region 02 |
21 |
10 |
24 |
14 |
19 |
33 |
3.43 |
 |
33 |
| Best Practice Region |
51 |
0 |
16 |
12 |
37 |
35 |
3.92 |
6 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Poor...Excellent |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 09F |
The level of resources they
devoted to this project. |
Region 02 |
22 |
14 |
23 |
18 |
32 |
14 |
3.09 |
 |
14 |
| Best Practice Region |
49 |
0 |
8 |
35 |
29 |
29 |
3.78 |
6 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Poor...Excellent |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 09G |
Range of reasonable
alternatives they suggested for this project. |
Region 02 |
14 |
14 |
14 |
36 |
21 |
14 |
3.07 |
 |
14 |
| Best Practice Region |
38 |
5 |
13 |
21 |
29 |
32 |
3.68 |
6 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Poor...Excellent |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 09H |
Willingness to consider a
range of mitigation measures. |
Region 02 |
19 |
11 |
26 |
11 |
21 |
32 |
3.37 |
 |
32 |
| Best Practice Region |
43 |
0 |
5 |
23 |
28 |
44 |
4.12 |
6 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 11A |
Understands your agency's
mission. |
Region 02 |
23 |
9 |
17 |
17 |
30 |
26 |
3.48 |
 |
26 |
| Best Practice Region |
41 |
7 |
7 |
20 |
27 |
39 |
3.83 |
4 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 11B |
Cares about your agency's
mission. |
Region 02 |
24 |
13 |
13 |
29 |
29 |
17 |
3.25 |
 |
17 |
| Best Practice Region |
37 |
3 |
24 |
22 |
27 |
24 |
3.46 |
4 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 11C |
Committed to doing quality
work. |
Region 02 |
22 |
5 |
0 |
23 |
32 |
41 |
4.05 |
 |
41 |
| Best Practice Region |
39 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
28 |
56 |
4.41 |
4 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 11D |
Has competent staff. |
Region 02 |
24 |
8 |
4 |
17 |
29 |
42 |
3.92 |
 |
42 |
| Best Practice Region |
39 |
0 |
5 |
8 |
44 |
44 |
4.26 |
4 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 11E |
There is a sufficient level
of trust between your two agencies. |
Region 02 |
23 |
4 |
17 |
35 |
17 |
26 |
3.43 |
 |
26 |
| Best Practice Region |
51 |
2 |
20 |
25 |
24 |
29 |
3.59 |
6 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 11F |
Is committed to making the
environmental review process efficient. |
Region 02 |
24 |
17 |
21 |
21 |
25 |
17 |
3.04 |
 |
17 |
| Best Practice Region |
51 |
4 |
16 |
24 |
29 |
27 |
3.61 |
6 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 11G |
Is willing to compromise. |
Region 02 |
24 |
17 |
8 |
25 |
38 |
13 |
3.21 |
 |
13 |
| Best Practice Region |
39 |
3 |
13 |
33 |
36 |
15 |
3.49 |
4 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 11H |
There is a sufficient level
of communication between the two agencies. |
Region 02 |
24 |
8 |
25 |
17 |
33 |
17 |
3.25 |
 |
17 |
| Best Practice Region |
41 |
5 |
10 |
17 |
32 |
37 |
3.85 |
4 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 11J |
Is committed to transportation improvements. |
Region 02 |
24 |
25 |
4 |
29 |
21 |
21 |
3.08 |
 |
21 |
| Best Practice Region |
35 |
3 |
26 |
23 |
20 |
29 |
3.46 |
5 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Worse...Improved |
Best Practice Region |
% Top Box
Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
| 12 |
Over the past 3 years, has
your agency's overall relationship with the resource agency
improved, stayed the same, or gotten worse? |
Region 02 |
24 |
8 |
54 |
38 |
 |
38 |
| Best Practice Region |
23 |
9 |
26 |
65 |
1 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
Poor...Excellent |
Mean Score |
Best Practice Region |
%Top Box Summary Previous
Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
%3 |
%4 |
%5 |
| 13 |
How would you characterize
the relationship between your agency and the resource agency? |
Region 02 |
24 |
13 |
13 |
25 |
33 |
17 |
3.29 |
 |
17 |
| Best Practice Region |
41 |
2 |
2 |
34 |
37 |
24 |
3.78 |
4 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
YES NO |
Best Practice Region |
% of
Yes Response Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
| 02 |
Did you experience any
problems with the resource agency during this project? |
Region 02 |
24 |
50 |
50 |
 |
50 |
| Best Practice Region |
23 |
22 |
78 |
1 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
YES NO |
Best Practice Region |
% of
Yes Response Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
| 03A |
Problems at early project
planning or scoping. |
Region 02 |
12 |
25 |
75 |
 |
25 |
| Best Practice Region |
* |
20 |
80 |
1,7,9,10 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
YES NO |
Best Practice Region |
% of
Yes Response Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
| 03B |
Problems at defining purpose
and need. |
Region 02 |
12 |
33 |
67 |
 |
33 |
| Best Practice Region |
18 |
6 |
94 |
3 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
YES NO |
Best Practice Region |
% of
Yes Response Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
| 03C |
Problems at information or
data collection. |
Region 02 |
11 |
18 |
82 |
 |
18 |
| Best Practice Region |
11 |
18 |
82 |
2 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
YES NO |
Best Practice Region |
% of
Yes Response Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
| 03D |
Problems at development and
analysis of alternatives. |
Region 02 |
12 |
33 |
67 |
 |
33 |
| Best Practice Region |
* |
25 |
75 |
1,6 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
YES NO |
Best Practice Region |
% of
Yes Response Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
| 03E |
Problems at analysis of
impacts. |
Region 02 |
10 |
70 |
30 |
 |
70 |
| Best Practice Region |
5 |
40 |
60 |
1 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
YES NO |
Best Practice Region |
% of
Yes Response Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
| 03F |
Problems at selection of
preferred alternatives. |
Region 02 |
11 |
55 |
45 |
 |
55 |
| Best Practice Region |
* |
17 |
83 |
3,6 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
YES NO |
Best Practice Region |
% of
Yes Response Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
| 03G |
Problems at commitment to
mitigation measures. |
Region 02 |
11 |
36 |
64 |
 |
36 |
| Best Practice Region |
13 |
23 |
77 |
4 |
 |
| Question Number |
Client-Specific Items |
Region Type |
Sample Size |
YES NO |
Best Practice Region |
% of
Yes Response Summary Previous Waves Now |
| %1 |
%2 |
| 03H |
Problems at finalizing
documents or response to comments. |
Region 02 |
11 |
64 |
36 |
 |
64 |
| Best Practice Region |
5 |
40 |
60 |
1 |
 |
|